Why Republicans Think Politics Should Be “Common Sense”

The idea that governance requires strategic decision-making, long-term planning, and nuanced trade-offs is unacceptable to them. But why do they think this way? Part 2 of "Why Facts Feel Like Attacks."

Why Republicans Think Politics Should Be “Common Sense”
Photo by Colin Lloyd / Unsplash

Republicans are deeply resistant to complexity, which is why they gravitate toward simplistic, black-and-white narratives about politics. The answer lies in a combination of cognitive limitations, cultural conditioning, and emotional decision-making.

1. Their Brains Struggle With Complexity 

Republicans don’t just prefer simple solutions—they genuinely struggle to process nuance. This cognitive rigidity leads to a fundamental distrust of anything that requires critical thinking. 

If a problem has multiple solutions, they assume it’s a trick. 

Republicans are uncomfortable with choices. If they are presented with two or more valid solutions to a problem, they assume someone is trying to deceive them.

Example: 

  • If a policymaker says, There are multiple ways to lower gas prices.”
  • A Republican voter won’t think, Oh, great, we have options! 
  • Instead, they assume: One of these solutions must be a scam. 

Why?

  • They were raised to believe that choices = traps. 
  • They associate “having options” with being manipulated or tricked. 
  • They assume the “obvious” answer (whatever aligns with their biases) is the correct one, and anything more complex is a lie. 

This is why they get angry when experts explain why a problem is complicated—it feels like stalling, deflection, or manipulation instead of actual information.

They literally cannot process nuance, so they reject anything that isn’t black-and-white.

Republicans prefer binary thinking—things must be good or evil, right or wrong, patriot or traitor. This black-and-white mindset makes it impossible for them to engage with complex topics like:

  • Climate change (They either think it’s real or a hoax—there is no room for partial truths or scientific debate.
  • Healthcare reform (Either the system is perfect, or it’s socialist tyranny—there’s no in between.
  • Foreign policy (Other countries are either our allies or our enemies—there is no room for strategic negotiation.

Example: 

 If a politician says, “We need to balance national security with diplomacy,” a Republican voter hears: 

  • “This person is weak.” 

If a politician says, “We should only bomb our enemies and never negotiate,” a Republican voter hears: 

  • “Finally, someone with common sense!” 

Republicans reject nuance because it makes them feel uncertain and uncomfortable.

2. They Were Raised in a Culture That Punishes Critical Thinking 

Many Republicans weren’t just raised to believe that questioning authority is unnecessary— they were actively punished for it.

Religious and conservative parents discourage questioning authority.

  • The Republican base is overwhelmingly evangelical and conservative Christian.
  • Faith requires obedience, not critical thinking. 
  • Challenging authority (a parent, a pastor, a leader) is seen as defiance, not intelligence. 

Example: 

  • A child asks, “Why does God let bad things happen?” 
  • The answer isn’t, “That’s a great question, let’s explore different perspectives.”
  • The answer is, “You don’t question God.” 

Questioning = Doubt 

Doubt = Weakness 

Weakness = Sinful

This creates adults who are deeply uncomfortable with questioning anything—including political leaders, policies, and their own beliefs.

If you challenge your father, your pastor, or your leader, you’re seen as disloyal. Republican culture is built around authoritarian family structures where:

  • The father is the ultimate authority. 
  • The pastor is the ultimate moral guide. 
  • The president is the ultimate patriot. 

Example: 

  • A child asks, Why do we vote Republican?” 
  • The father doesn’t say, “Let’s discuss different policies and viewpoints.”
  • The father says, “Because we’re Republicans. That’s what good Americans do.” 

This conditioning trains them to see questioning authority as a personal attack—which is why: 

  • They get defensive when someone criticizes Trump or the GOP. 
  • They view liberalism as rebellion, not just an alternative viewpoint. 
  • They perceive intellectual debate as an attack instead of a discussion. 

They don’t just resist questioning authority—they were raised to see it as disloyal, sinful, and un-American.

3. Politics is a “Vibe” Game to Them 

Since Republicans don’t engage with politics as a policy-driven process, they default to vibes, emotions, and personality traits when choosing leaders. They don’t understand policy, so they vote based on how a politician makes them feel.

Coincidentally, when I searched "republican" to find a photo for this post, one of the first to popup was from a Stop the Steel rally, and at the center is someone wearing a shirt that reads: "Don't kill my vibes."

Republicans aren’t analyzing a candidate’s legislative record, economic policy, or diplomatic strategies. Instead, they are asking themselves: 

  • Does this person sound strong? 
  • Do they make me feel safe? 
  • Do they trigger the people I don’t like? 

Example: 

A Democrat says, “We need a balanced approach to national security, including intelligence-gathering and cooperation with our allies.”

A Republican hears:  “This person is a weak, over-educated nerd who doesn’t know how the real world works.”

Trump says, “I’ll bomb the hell out of them, believe me!”

A Republican hears: “Finally, someone who understands common sense!” 

This is why: 

  • They think “sounding tough” = being a strong leader 
  • They think “big words” = being a liar
  • They think “nuance” = being weak

They aren’t choosing politicians based on intelligence or expertise—they are choosing them based on who feels the strongest.

3. The Root Cause: Republicans Crave Simplicity, Not Solutions 

  • They struggle with complexity. 
  • They were raised to obey, not question. 
  • They choose leaders based on emotions, not competence.

This is why they cannot engage with real policy discussions. It’s not just that they don’t want to—they literally don’t know how. 


They want a "tough talker"

If something requires critical thinking, analysis, or delayed gratification, they assume it’s a scam. This is why they will always prefer a “tough talker” over an intelligent policymaker:

  • Because at the end of the day, they aren’t looking for solutions. They’re looking for emotional validation.

While we're on the subject of emotional validation, we need to talk about protecting our peace.

Protect Your Peace: Your Are Not Responsible for "Fixing" Anyone

Respect your boundaries

You are not obligated to debate, educate or change someone who is committed to ignorance. Engaging in endless arguments with someone who refuses to think critically will only drain your energy.

Refuse to be emotionally baited

Many conservatives argue in bad faith, not to learn, but to provoke a reaction. You don't have to engage. You don't have to prove anything. Sometimes, the best response is no response at all.

Let go of false expectations

If someone has spent their entire life rejecting new information, it's unlikely that one conversation will change them.

You can disengage

Walking away from an unproductive conversation is not "losing." It's recognizing that your energy is better spent elsewhere.


The Republican War on Knowledge Is Not an Accident 

They weren’t born this way—they were conditioned

Republicans don’t just reject education by accident; they were conditioned to see critical thinking and self-reflection as a threat, over many generations. White supremacy and evangelical Christianity created an anti-intellectual culture the GOP exploits to this day. They know how to use the conservative worldview to manipulate their voters by perpetuating a scarcity mindset:

  • The more we exclude others, the more resources available to us.
  • If someone else has more understanding, it must be at your expense.
  • So-called "experts" aren't smart, they're manipulative.
  • Simple, absolute truths are "common sense."
  • If a fact doesn't reflect your worldview, that's not "common sense" so it must be rejected.
  • Systemic barriers don't exist—what you get in this life is what you deserve.
  • New ideas are threats, not opportunities.

This fear-based, zero-sum thinking is rigid and predictable. Scarcity thinking defends against discomfort. White privilege has historically granted white Americans more access to power, resources and opportunities. But rather than seeing what they do have, scarcity thinking frames equity as a threat to white Republican's status.

Critical thinking requires openness, curiosity and adaptability, and acknowledging that privilege exists—meaning that success isn't purely the result of "hard work" but also systemic, unearned advantages. Nuance introduces the possibility that historical injustices (redlining, voter suppression, segregation) still have consequences today. But that scarcity mindset resists complexity because if white privilege is real, their perceived entitlement to power and success becomes harder to justify.

Understanding more might unravel their carefully guarded beliefs. If resources, power, and knowledge are zero-sum, then privilege can only be maintained by keeping others out. That's why the right fights so hard against education, diversity, and systemic change. White privilege is not just about power—it's about controlling the narrative that justifies that power.


Silver lining

If someone can be trained into ignorance, they can be untrained to.

Here are some practical steps to combat anti-intellectualism:

  • Frame education as empowerment, not elitism.
  • Target young conservatives before their ideology solidifies.
  • Call-out corporate and GOP manipulation of conservative voters.
  • Promote media literacy programs to counter propaganda.
  • Respect your own boundaries and protect your peace.

How Do We Break the Cycle? 

Teach them how propaganda works 

  • If they understand how they’ve been manipulated, they can start to question their own assumptions. 
  • We need to make breaking out of ignorance a point of pride, not a source of shame. 

Expose how the system actually benefits them

  • The Electoral College, Senate representation, and gerrymandering favor Republicans. 
  • If the system were actually “rigged against them,” they wouldn’t keep winning. 

Call out the manufactured victimhood 

  • They believe Democrats and intellectuals are oppressing them, but they control most state legislatures and governorships. 
  • The GOP’s goal is to keep them angry, afraid, and blaming everyone but themselves.

The only way to break this cycle is to expose it, dismantle it, and make knowledge a source of power, not shame.